Days after the Philippine Senate declined to launch the impeachment trial of the country’s vice president, two interviews with Filipinos arguing for and against the move went viral.
Neither were real.
The schoolboys and elderly woman making their cases were AI creations, examples of increasingly sophisticated fakes possible with even basic online tools.
“Why single out the VP?”, a digitally created boy in a white school uniform asks, arguing that the case was politically motivated.
The House of Representatives impeached Sara Duterte in early February on charges of graft, corruption and an alleged assassination plot against former ally and running mate President Ferdinand Marcos (archived link).
But after convening as an impeachment court on June 10, the senior body immediately sent the case back to the House, questioning its constitutionality (archived link).
Duterte ally Senator Ronald dela Rosa shared the video of the schoolboys — since viewed millions of times — praising the youths for having a “better understanding of what’s happening” than their adult counterparts.
The vice president’s younger brother Sebastian, mayor of family stronghold Davao, said the clip proved “liberals” did not have the support of the younger generation.
When the schoolboys were exposed as digital creations, the vice president and her supporters were unfazed.
“There’s no problem with sharing an AI video in support of me. As long as it’s not being turned into a business,” Duterte told reporters (archived link).
“Even if it’s AI… I agree with the point,” said Dela Rosa, the one-time enforcer of ex-president Rodrigo Duterte’s drug war.
Five minutes’ work
The video making the case for impeachment — also with millions of views — depicts an elderly woman peddling fish and calling out the Senate for failing to hold a trial.
“You 18 senators, when it’s the poor who steal, you want them locked up immediately, no questions asked. But if it’s the vice president who stole millions, you protect her fiercely,” she says in Tagalog.
Both clips bore a barely discernible watermark for the Google video-generation platform Veo.
AFP fact-checkers also identified visual inconsistencies, such as overly smooth hair and teeth and storefronts with garbled signage.
Read the full story on AFP Fact Check.